A Time to Grieve

Ki Tetzei By :  Matthew Berkowitz Alum (RS), President of The Schechter Institutes, Inc., Former Director of Israel Programs, JTS Posted On Sep 5, 2014 / 5774 | Gender Israel

As the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas continues to hold and war is waged against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), we turn our soul鈥檚 attention to Parashat Ki Tetzei. Quite fittingly, this week鈥檚 Torah reading opens by teaching one of the biblical ordinances related to ethical conduct in war. Specifically,

[W]hen you take the field against your enemies and the Lord your God delivers them into your power and you take some of them captive, and you see among the captives a beautiful woman and you desire her and would take her to wife, you will bring her into your house . . . She will spend a month鈥檚 time in your home lamenting her father and mother; after that you may possess her and she will be your wife. Then should you no longer want her, you must release her outright. (Deut. 21:10鈥14)

While acknowledging this specific case as disturbing to our modern ethics and sensibilities, one must also read these verses closely and sensitively within their historical context. Far from advocating the immediate 鈥減ossession鈥 of the woman by an Israelite victor, Torah legislates the woman鈥檚 need and right to mourn for her father and mother over a given period of time. Only after this month of reflection, may the Israelite then take her as a wife. What does Torah teach us by acknowledging the very real and painful emotions of the captive?

Professor Ze鈥檈v Falk explains,

It is your obligation to honor the emotions of the daughter 惫颈蝉-脿-惫颈蝉 her parents. A parallel passage to this may be found in the biblical narrative addressing the nest of a bird: 鈥淵ou will not take the mother bird from her children. You will surely send the mother bird away and only then will you take the baby birds鈥 (Deuteronomy 22:6鈥7). Here the obligation is to respect the emotions of the mother for her children. Injuring the mother along with the children is considered exceeding cruelty because it precisely undermines the elementary obligation to be fruitful and to multiply. Compare: with regard to Jacob fearing Esau, 鈥淒eliver me . . . else I fear, he may come and strike me down, mothers and children alike鈥 (Genesis 32:12); 鈥渙n a day of battle when mothers and children were dashed to death together鈥 (Hosea 10:14); and the prohibition cited numerous times that 鈥渙ne should not cook a kid in its mother鈥檚 milk鈥 (Exodus 23:19, etc.). Perhaps it is for this reason that destroying a whole city represents unique cruelty because it is done together with killing all of the children of the city: 鈥淚 am one of those who seek the welfare of Israel! But you seek to bring death upon a city and mother of Israel! (II Samuel 20:19).鈥 (Divrei Torah Ad Tumam, 441)

Even though war against a brutal enemy is justified, the chaos of war cannot lead to moral and ethical decay. Torah and Professor Falk鈥檚 commentary underscore the extent to which Scripture honors emotional and familial bonds. Such connections and emotional relationships increase our humanity. Those who plotted and executed the murder of three Israeli teenagers; those who murdered the Palestinian youth in Jerusalem; those who launched the subsequent rocket attacks against Israeli communities; and those perpetrating genocide for ISIS are all acting without regard for family, religion, humanity, and God. Fundamentalist furor is annihilating the sacred and precious lives of innocent civilians the world over.

May Torah continually serve as our guidepost鈥攎aking us keenly aware of the emotions and pain of our fellow human beings鈥攁nd may our Scripture lead us to a place of healing and peace among all the nations of the world.

The publication and distribution of A Taste of Torah are made possible by a generous grant from Sam and Marilee Susi.